General Motors said on Wednesday that it was using new crash test dummies that work at “hyper speed,” recording and transmitting data 10,000 times a second. Since the final portion of the document concludes the Air Force’s report on why its personnel was as sure as they could be that the strange bodies were really dummies, I’ll present it without interruption: Recoveries of the test dummies were accomplished by personnel from the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch. 53 Typically, eight to twelve civilian and military recovery personnel arrived at the site of an anthropomorphic dummy landing as soon as possible following impact. The recovery crews operated a variety of aircraft and vehicles. These included a wrecker, a six-by-six, a weapons carrier, and L-20 observation and C-47 transport aircraft — the exact vehicles and aircraft described by the witnesses as having been present at the crashed saucer locations. On one occasion, just southwest of Roswell, a High Dive project officer, 1st Lt. Raymond A. Madson, even conducted a search for dummies on horseback.
Beginning with 2011 model-year vehicles, federal regulators have required automakers to use petite female crash dummies in frontal automotive crash tests. While work with cadavers had aroused some opposition, primarily from religious institutions, it was grudgingly accepted because the dead, being dead, felt no pain, and the indignity of their situations was directly related to easing the pain of the living. Animal research, on the other hand, aroused much greater passion. Animal rights groups such as the ASPCA were vehement in their protest, and while researchers such as Patrick supported animal testing because of its ability to produce reliable, applicable data, there was nonetheless a strong ethical unease about this process.
Through the hundred-plus year history of the automobile, safety has always been a serious concern. In some cases, according to tests with female mannequins, small women were almost three times as likely as their average male counterparts to be seriously injured or killed. A study of actual crashes by the University of Virginia’s Center for Applied Biomechanics found that women wearing seatbelts were 47 percent more likely to be seriously injured than males in similar accidents.
Since that time, increasingly sophisticated dummies have been used to determine the effectiveness of seat belts, airbags and every other type of safety device. The latest generation of dummies can record hundreds of separate movements and employ a variety of sensors to gather every possible scrap of data from each crash. They now include child-sized crash-test dummies.
Although to begin with crash testing remained on a relatively small scale, from the 1960s onwards the procedure became increasingly established as a reliable instrument for optimizing and testing vehicle safety. And at Mercedes-Benz thorough crash testing was applied not only to passenger cars but also to vans, commercial vehicles and even coaches.
In the test, a brighter illuminating is necessary for working. A normal machine comes with 25-watt halogen bulbs. Well but we can change the bulb to a white 9012 led bulbs easily for better operating, it is a tiny change but helps a lot.